Sony Alpha SLT-A55 and SLT-A33 Translucent Mirror Cameras

2010 Photokina Featured Mirrorless News Sony Uncategorized

 
Sony Alpha SLT-A55V and SLT-A33 Translucent Mirror Technology DSLRsThere’s a new twist on the “EVIL” (Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens) camera strategy. Yesterday, Sony announced two “SLT” (Single Lens Transparent) cameras, the 16.2-megapixel Alpha SLT-A55 and 14.2-megapixel Alpha SLT-A33. Both cameras use “Translucent Mirror Technology,” which I think is what we used to call a pellicle mirror. Like Sony’s recent NEX cameras and the Olympus and Panasonic Micro Four Thirds cameras, the new Sony Alpha SLT-A55 and SLT-A33 have an electronic viewfinder instead of the traditional SLR TTL optical viewfinder. Where they differ from the NEX and Micro Four Thirds cameras is the transparent mirror between the lens and sensor. The mirror allows Sony to use phase-detect auto focus in the SLT cameras instead of the less accurate contrast-detect auto focus used in video DSLRs and other EVIL cameras. That means the new Sony SLT cameras should have much better continuous auto focus in movie mode than any current digital SLR or EVIL camera. Sony also included a new 15-point auto focus system and the A55 is capable of 10-frames-per-second, making it the fastest camera for under $1000 as well as the fastest camera with an APS-C sensor.

Sony Alpha SLT-A55 single lens translucent mirror camera

Back in the olden days, when digital cameras were the size of a brick and had VGA sensors, Canon had a 35mm SLR called the EOS-1N RS (Canon EOS-1N RS 35mm SLR reviews). I wanted one. Bad. That’s because the Canon EOS-1 RS had a transparent pellicle mirror that allowed it to shoot 10 frames-per-second. Traditionally, the mirror that allows you to see through the lens of an SLR has to move out of the way to allow light to reach the film or sensor. If you have a transparent mirror, all you have to do is open the shutter – no need to swing that big, heavy mirror up and out of the way. The mirror is also important because that’s where the auto focus sensor array is located. A transparent mirror allows the auto focus to remain active even while pictures are being taken – or while the camera is in Live View / movie mode. SLRs with regular mirrors and mirrorless cameras like the Olympus Pen Digitals can’t use phase-detect auto focus in Live View or movie mode. They’re limited to the slower, less accurate contrast-detect auto focus. “Translucent Mirror Technology” allows the Sony SLT A55 and A33 cameras to use phase-detect auto focus for both stills and video and it also makes the super fast 10 FPS frame rate possible in the A55.

The two new SLT cameras are quite a coup for Sony – especially following on the heels of Nikon’s D3100 digital SLR announcement, “the world’s first D-SLR to introduce full time auto focus (AF) in Live View and D-Movie mode…” Since the D3100 is still limited to contrast-detect auto focus, the Sony announcement really steals Nikon’s D3100 thunder.

The new Sony Alpha SLT-A55 and the A33 capture full 1920 x 1080 60i AVCHD video and have built-in, sensor-level Super SteadyShot image stabilization. Both cameras also have a built-in pop-up flash and fully articulated, 3-inch tilt-swivel LCD display. The A55, as mentioned, has a faster 10 FPS burst rate. But the A33 also has a very respectable 7 FPS burst rate. The A55 and A33 cameras have a sensitivity range of ISO 100 to 12,800 and a full range of exposure controls. They also include some more consumer-friendly fun features like built-in HDR, Hand-held Twilight, Sweep Panorama, 3D capture, HDMI output, and the A55 has built-in GPS for tagging photos.

The Sony Alpha SLT-A33 will be available in September and the A55 will be available in October for $650 and $750, respectively. For $100 more you can buy each camera in a kit with the Sony 18-55mm zoom lens.

Official Sony Alpha SLT-A55 and SLT-A33 Press Release >>

 
Sony Alpha SLT A55 Reviews & Shopping:

Sony Alpha SLT A33 Reviews & Shopping:

Related Content:
Sony Digital SLR User Reviews
All Digital SLR User Reviews
Sony Cameras Forum
EVIL & Micro Four Thirds Cameras Forum
Digital SLR Forum
More Sony News, Reviews And Articles
Sony Web Site

Sony Alpha SLT-A55 Translucent Mirror Technology DSLR

Sony_Alpha_SLTA55V_SideSony_Alpha_SLTA55V_LCDSony_Alpha_SLTA55V_FlashSony Alpha SLT-A33 Translucent Mirror Technology DSLR

Sony_Alpha_SLTA33Sony_Alpha_SLTA33_LensSony_Alpha_SLTA33_FrontSony_Alpha_SLTA33_Top


(Visited 7,078 times, 1 visits today)
About the author: Photo-John

Photo-John, a.k.a. John Shafer, is the managing editor of PhotographyREVIEW.com and has been since the site launched back in 1999. He's an avid outdoor enthusiast and spends as much time as possible on his mountain bike, hiking or skiing in the mountains. He's been taking pictures for ever and ever, and never goes anywhere without a camera.


Related Articles


NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Joseph S says:

    Saying contrast detect is “less accurate” is somewhat disingenuous. If the distance to the phase detect sensors is not EXACTLY the same as the distance to the sensor, then phase detect focus will be offset from the correct focus – this has been observed in some cameras. And how does a person check the focus? You look for high contrast, sharp transitions. That’s what contrast detect focus does.

    Some phase detect cameras have far fewer than 15 sensors, because each phase detect sensor costs money. Contrast detect, based on the main sensor, can have as many focus points as the manufacturer cares to specify and deal with.

    Now, you could say contrast detect focus is slower than phase detect, that’s in general true. But “less accurate”? How do you tell, if not by looking at exactly what contrast detect looks at?

  • Photo-John says:

    Thanks for the commment, Joseph. Calling my statement “disengenuous” implies that I meant to confuse the issue or miselad people. And that’s not the cae at all. It sounds like you understand the technical differences between the two systems better than I do. My analysis comes from the (practical) perspective of a photographer who’s used lots of cameras in lots of conditions and relies on auto focus for action sports photography. And in my experience, what I said is absolutely true. That said, I am curious to see if the new Nikon D3100 can outperform my expectations. But based on my experience so far I’d put my money on the new Sony to outperform any EVIL for digital SLR for continuous auto focus.

    Thanks again for your comment. It’s great when someone with specific expertise can add something or correct something I’ve written. If you want to share more technical details on the differences between the two systems, that would be great :-)

  • spydercam says:

    Just wanted to say thanks for the review.

    -spydercam

  • John Cassan says:

    Sounds great, but will the ev hinder actions sports such as horse racing in that what you see was and is not there now? You would have to really be good at anticipating where the shot is. Horse racing is hard enough with optical view. It reminds me of the days before auto focus when you anticipated and readied your shot before the horses hit the spot. If you get used to the lag I guess you can anticipate the shot and the fast AF will take over.Yest ahving no controll over your aperature or shutter speed can really kill an action shot. For instance when shooting with a 2.8 fast lens and the camera chooses F5.6 or slower on a cloudy day you may have a shutter speed of 300 0r slower and get a blurry subject. Not to worry if it uses the highest opening and the fastest speed automatically. That should be the case if you are shooting 10fps.

  • Lorkh says:

    Just want to say Thanks for the article/overview!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*