Fujifilm X-Pro1 First Impressions & Video

Camera Reviews Featured Fujifilm Mirrorless Samples Videos

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Sample Photos
The thumbnails below link to full-size, informal Fujifilm X-Pro1 JPEG sample photos I shot on a tripod in the Pictureline store. I shot tests at all sensitivity settings, from ISO 100 to ISO 12,800. No adjustments have been made in post-processing. All I did was open the JPEG files in Photoshop, add the text, logo and graybar and then resave as a maximum quality JPEG. Once I can get my hands on an X-Pro1 for a longer period of time I’ll make new, controlled RAW photo tests in the studio. But these will do for now and I think they do look very good.

 
Warning: these files are HUGE – be patient while they download.

 

Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 100 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 100 Sample
Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 200 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 200 Sample
Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 400 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 400 Sample

Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 800 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 800 Sample
Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 1600 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 1600 Sample
Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 3200 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 3200 Sample

Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 6400 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 6400 Sample
Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO 12,800 Sample Photo - click for full-size image file
Fujifilm X-Pro1
ISO 12,800 Sample

Back To Fujifilm X-Pro First Impressions & Video Page >>

Special thanks to Pictureline in Salt Lake City, Utah for providing the Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS camera for review!

 

Related Content:
All Fujifilm User Reviews
All Digital Camera User Reviews
Digital Cameras Forum
More Fujifilm News & Articles
Fujifilm Web Site

 
 
Thanks to Pictureline for providing the Fujifilm X-Pro1 for this article and video!
 Pictureline


(Visited 3,257 times, 1 visits today)
About the author: Photo-John

Photo-John, a.k.a. John Shafer, is the managing editor of PhotographyREVIEW.com and has been since the site launched back in 1999. He's an avid outdoor enthusiast and spends as much time as possible on his mountain bike, hiking or skiing in the mountains. He's been taking pictures for ever and ever, and never goes anywhere without a camera.


Related Articles


NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Joe Prete says:

    Actually, I think they say the top and bottom plates are magnesium alloy. The only thing they say about the body itself, is that it’s covered with a “leather like” covering. They never said what material the body is constructed of. The other reviews mentioned the very slow focus and that it is extremely overpriced. As for a comparison to a Leica, there is only one camera that “is like” a Leica, and that is of course, another Leica!

    I do have a Question: So did you buy one PhotoJohn?

    • Photo-John says:

      Good details about the build, Joe. Regardless, the X-Pro is crazy light for its size.

      I did not notice slow focus, although I only got to use it for about half an hour. Overpriced – I don’t know about that. Compared to an M9 it’s really cheap. But compared to the Olympus E-P3 it’s definitely expensive. The image quality is very impressive, though – the best I’ve seen from an APS-C camera. So you are getting something for your money.

      I did not buy one. I mostly use zoom lenses so a camera that limits me to primes isn’t going to cut it. If they do come out with some zooms for the X-Pro1, I will get more interested. I really enjoyed using the X10 and the X-Pro1 feels very similar. With zoom lenses, I think it could make a very good travel camera for me.

  • Joe Prete says:

    Hey Photo-John, I gotta tell ya right off, I have quite a list of “should haves” for Fuji. But I’m not saying any of that here. I have too much respect for you, your site, Nick & “PIictureline” .
    Let’s look at the glass half full today O K? So, you used the Fuji a bit & you liked it John. I could see that, who wouldn’t want a chance to check it out? Kinda brought you back to a much different photo world,(Modern Photography before the merger) when we got our “Photo by____” credit & stock photos where supposed to be our nest-egg. A Very extreme Disappointment! Sure it was quieter, there were much fewer of us around then.

    You have to give Fuji credit though, they dared to dream, and they followed it through. I must admit that when Fuji said interchangeable lenses about a year ago, I envisioned the Fuji/Nikon DSLR. I am glad that I was wrong. Who knows how long they worked on this one. They had to build jigs & dies, re-tool and re-train a whole factory. And if they’re building the lenses in house, you can double the size of the factory. As many cameras as there are out there, this still grabbed everyones attention. It also seems to fit very many individual styles. Today, that says a lot. The three primes are out, now only the zoom is left. ….. For now

    I do hope that with the studio lights of today, that plugging in to the “sync” socket won’t cause any problems (I still rely on radio triggers) But there is room in a studio for a range finder. Not everything has to sound like a machine gun & get a tight cropped Headshot
    So in the coming weeks, there’s going to be so many “Pros” & Cons it will make your head spin, but if this is the camera for you, then don’t be swayed. Remember, the next stop is thousands of dollars away! So if this fits your style, just know that it’s the only game in town. If we’re lucky maybe the rental companies will stock a few, that way if you have a hunch that this kind of shooting is the style you need, it won’t cost that much to find out. And Photo-John don’t forget that Fuji has a Super Zoom EXR in the $800.00 range for those that want an all in one, it looks like an SLR and it zooms to about 625MM I must admit, I wouldn’t
    mind shooting with that one for an hour or two either.

  • Joe Prete says:

    To any of you, who read the prior posts, please take a moment to read this. It has to do with Rangefinder cameras and the less used Twin Lens Reflex camera. There are a few reasons that these cameras became practically extinct. First thing you need to know is the Parallax Factor. You need to remember in either case that you’re looking through one lens, and your photograph is being taken from the other lens. On the Rangefinder, the other lens is the eye viewfinder, but it still is a type of lens. When you’re a distance from your subject, the Parallax Correction (and the distance) pretty much do the job for you, but when you come in close to the subject it’s a different story. You may not get any part of your subject in the picture because you are looking in the viewfinder (lens) and the camera lens may be way off the mark. The same is true for the TLR or Twin Lens Reflex camera, even more so.

    Another problem that came with the TLR and Rangefinder was the flash sync. You had to adapt to the sync speed if the shutter was in the lens, or if it was a Focal Plane shutter. It was pre set, you had to adapt. Depending on what you were shooting, you had to work with that sync speed. A third problem has to do with accessories. Putting on a filter on a TLR might mean finding a 36MM filter. Putting a filter on a rangefinder involved getting coloured filter plastic sheets, scissors and tape. If you’re asking yourself “Why bother?” Well, there are some advantages. It’s a quieter shutter, a Rangefinder is usually smaller, it seems to do very good street photography. Some people prefer them, the easy going people. They don’t worry about getting everything exact the way most of us do.

    I had a many TLR’s, the Mamiya C330 took beautiful pictures, it sat on a tripod & I had a second lens pair, the 180MM pair was one of the best Portrait lenses around. I also had Minolta Autocord CDS (that meant the meter) There’s still plenty of Yashicamat 124g’s around. I made quite a profit on my TLR’s and Rangefinders. Now my Mamiya 645PRO does all my studio work on film. So, that’s it in a nutshell, but the truth is there are many Rangefinders in the junk draw or in the attic. I may be boring many of you who do know all of this, but I meet very many people who only know Digital, never had a darkroom, never shot TRI-X, Kodakchrome, Never heard of Dektol, D76 or C41. Hard to believe if you’ve been there, but I teach a class here and there and the basics are still taught. Nikon still has two Film cameras, Pentax Must, (they made THE student camera) Getting back to the Rangefinder, I think it’s important for the people who missed all the (fun?) But they should know before they blow all their money on something that is just about extinct. DON’T tell me other manufacturers are going to build Rangefinders. I doubt if even one company can make a profit on it. ……

    • Mel Snyder says:

      I have an X-Pro1 on my list because I ***DO*** remember D76, and Panatomic-X and still probably have measurable levels of Dektol in my venous system. I also own a 35mm f1.4 Summilux, a 50mm f2 Summicron, and a 90mm f2.8 Tele-Elmarit – and, you guessed it, a 1982 era Leica M4P that rarely gets used vs. my D7000 and D300. I would love to be able to justify an M9, but can’t. I’m just waiting for the Fuji M adapter to be available.

      I still crave the absolute focus certainty of a manually focused or guess-focused rangefinder. At the risk of being called a troglodyte, I believe that if you can’t look at a scene and figure out exposure by eye for 200-800 ISO within an f stop or so, you aren’t yet a photographer. I am amazed at how many of today’s camera users never turn off autofocus and autoexposure, and just take the time to learn the basics.

      I understand that the Fuji lens are basically focus-by-wire, not mechanical in manual mode, which is discouraging.

      PS: I still have a Mamiyaflex C-3 with the 180mm lens(es) (and the awful Porroflex mirror prism) and a Minolta Autocord CDS. Like you, I made a ton of money in college and afterward with both. My son has my 645 system (the old one with the drop-in film spools). Another money-maker from the 80s!

      • Joe Prete says:

        Mel, Finally someone who knows real photography! I’m glad you wrote in. Sounds like we can have a conversation together, but I’m not sure if you should bite at the bait Fuji put out. I don’t think you’ll find what you’re looking for in this body and I think there may be some changes soon. I spoke to Photo-John, and I’m waiting to hear back from him before I go any deeper into this. I’ll send him another email, but today is a bad day to get any business done, he may be busy. Please don’t buy anything just yet, even if it’s firmware updates it’s always better to let them fix it while it’s still their problem, and not yours. I’ll check in from time to time so I don’t lose contact with you. I can tell from the other sites that a lot of people think it’s best to wait- (unless this is pocket change to you) Hey, I hope you didn’t give up on film, did you? I’ll send him an email now and if he’s ready, I’ll be in touch soon. It was very good to hear from you Mel …….. Joe Prete

      • Joe Prete says:

        Mel Snyder,
        Why are you NOT using your Leica? What are you saving it for? Because you don’t want to use film? And also, You would attach a LEICA lens to another parties (a 3rd party) Adapter? I’ve seen lenses stuck on adapters, bodies, extension tubes, you name it. It almost never turns out right. You might save one piece, but it’s very hard to save Both!. Sometimes the pieces are locked in to each other. You know people are still using film, you might like it better now. You can scan them to digital if you want to, or you can have it done almost anywhere. I do.

        Only attach different brand gear to each other if it’s been approved by both manufacturers.
        Only attach unapproved gear if you’re willing to lose one or both pieces of gear.

  • Photo-John says:

    Thanks for the rangefinder lesson, Joe. I think it’s great you added some historical perspective here. That makes the article more valuable for our younger readers. Also – go right ahead and give us your list of “should haves” for the X-Pro1. I’m curious – and again – the more information and perspective here, the better. Plus, when I actually get an X-Pro1 for a review review, your criticism should help me write a better review :-)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*